Heidelminicast: Alan Keyes Demonstrates How To Make A Natural Law Argument

These are some of our favorite Heidelquotes. Something to think about from the Heidelcast. If you are subscribed to the Heidelcast or the Heidelblog (see below) you will receive these episodes automatically.

Call or text the Heidelphone anytime at (760) 618-1563. Leave a message or email us us a voice memo from your phone and we may use it in a future podcast. Record it and email it to Heidelcast at heidelcast dot net.

If you benefit from the Heidelcast please leave a five-star review on Apple Podcasts so that others can find it.

Please do not forget to make the coffer clink (see the donate button below).

Resources

Subscribe to the Heidelblog today!


8 comments

  1. I wonder if David French ever heard (of) Alan Keyes.

    I would like to witness a Natural Law based takedown of French who has been really gaslighting conservatives, evangelicals and even the confessionals these days.

  2. I think it is probably on the books but if there aren’t any questions on the marriage license application, I don’t know of anyone who would ask. If two relatives want to cohabit, marriage isn’t much of an obstacle anymore.

  3. Yes, Alan Keyes is brilliant. What a mind!
    Recently read The Republic, where Socrates makes the same argument regarding having children held in community, not knowing their true parents, and the increased risk for incest occurring. But the snickers from the audience at his logic implies ‘who could think such a thing?’ Well, it’s not new nor uninformed.

    • Dr. Clark: Premarital blood tests were cheap, quick, and were meant only to prevent those with venereal disease from marrying. Consanguinity was determined, if necessary, by a family history. But it could be circumvented by misrepresentation. Sophisticated and expensive genetic screening only came about after the advent of DNA screening but was never a pre-marital requirement.

Comments are closed.