- All the Episodes of the Heidelcast
- The Heidelcast Series on Christian Nationalism
- Subscribe to the Heidelcast!
- On X @Heidelcast
- On Insta & Facebook @Heidelcast
- Subscribe in Apple Podcast
- Subscribe directly via RSS
- Call The Heidelphone via Voice Memo On Your Phone
- The Heidelcast is available wherever podcasts are found including Spotify.
Call or text the Heidelphone anytime at (760) 618-1563. Leave a message or email us a voice memo from your phone and we may use it in a future podcast. Record it and email it to heidelcast@heidelblog.net. If you benefit from the Heidelcast please leave a five-star review on Apple Podcasts so that others can find it. Please do not forget to make the coffer clink (see the donate button below).
SHOW NOTES
- How To Subscribe To Heidelmedia
- The Heidelblog Resource Page
- Heidelmedia Resources
- The Ecumenical Creeds
- The Reformed Confessions
- The Heidelberg Catechism
- Recovering the Reformed Confession (Phillipsburg: P&R Publishing, 2008)
- Why I Am A Christian
- What Must A Christian Believe?
- Heidelblog Contributors
- Support Heidelmedia: use the donate button or send a check to:
Heidelberg Reformation Association
1637 E. Valley Parkway #391
Escondido CA 92027The HRA is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization
Heidelcast
The Heidelcast is the official podcast of the Heidelberg Reformation Association. With more than 800 episodes, the Heidelcast has been in production since 2009.
More by Heidelcast ›
On kinism, Wolf in CN, what’s your take? Is he, despite his denial, maintaining a form of kinism?
He begins w/ eisegetical arguments that are used by kinists (i.e., ethnic “nations” are a non-racist form of segregation, grounded in the pre-fall administration of the cov. of works, that applies until the 2nd coming). He then goes on to defend ethnic-nation segregation by the erroneous interpretations.
Yet, some reformed folks are willingly accepting Wolf’s denial.
Final, a question here:
You mention the phrase “general equity” being grounded in “natural law”. W/o further thought, that makes sense. But you note some historical contexts demonstrating this. For my edification/usage, might you reference some resources?
Hi Reed,
There are several illustrative quotations here.
Thx! Just listened to episode 10, where you reference. Gonna dive in.
On anti-Semitism, this series having seasoned a bit, it seems you are more on top of a latent necessity than some (sub)CNs want to own. There are a host of fellow travelers (true anti-Semites) that the CNers are sheepish and milktoast in their eschewing. Other CNers seem to want to dissect these fellow travelers “CN” opinions, and pull a meat vs bones application. But, as the whole CN fish stinks, they won’t find that works.
Check out Jake Meador’s twitter thread on the ties between CN and anti-semitism and even the neo-Nazi movement. He has also written on this at Mere Orthodoxy.
Just now getting to listening to this series. Thought I might post some comments/questions before they slip my mind.
On “Mere Christendom”, ITSM that on this topic, folks come in one of 2 varieties:
1) They have not yet worked through the necessary, implications and inferences of their position. When they do, they’ll recognize that they are more consistent with the likes of strict/consistent theonomists/reconstructionists. OR
2) They have worked through these, do want their version of strict/consistent theonomy/reconstruction, and they’re dissembling like a shady politician who knows he/she won’t get elected by letting their flag fly unfurled.
Dear Scott,
you may be interested in this article: https://reformedlibertarians.com/against-civil-establishment-of-religion/ reflecting on Charles Hodge’s summary argument against civil establishment of religion. We see biblical reason for the task of civil governance to be even more restricted than that held by a “second table” view, and explain part of that reasoning in the article.
Appreciating your series.