Heidelminicast Q&A: Is Divorce Ever OK?

Call or text the Heidelphone anytime at (760) 618-1563. Leave a message or email us a voice memo from your phone and we may use it in a future podcast. Record it and email it to heidelcast@heidelblog.net. If you benefit from the Heidelcast please leave a five-star review on Apple Podcasts so that others can find it. Please do not forget to make the coffer clink (see the donate button below).

SHOW NOTES

Heidelberg Reformation Association
1637 E. Valley Parkway #391
Escondido CA 92027

The HRA is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization

Subscribe to the Heidelblog today!


2 comments

  1. “Otherwise they would be unclean”

    It just dawned on me that to be unclean is to be unwashed. I wonder if Paul already had infant baptism in view here. Could he be saying, “Your children were already baptized because they have a right to the sacrament. And that right was exercised because one of the child’s parents is a believer,”

  2. T,

    Certainly Paul is arguing from the greater (i.e., the more certain) to the lesser (i.e., to the less certain) when argues that 1) we all know that the children of believers are clean, therefore, by analogy, the spouse of a believer is (ritually) clean.

    Does that imply that they were already baptized? It may. It’s a very interesting suggestion. It certainly doesn’t fit the Baptist paradigm in which the children of believers are effectively ritually unclean until they prove that they are regenerate and eligible for baptism. I’m confident that Paul did not think that way at all.

Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments are welcome but must observe the moral law. Comments that are profane, deny the gospel, advance positions contrary to the Reformed confession, or irritate the management are subject to deletion. Anonymous comments, posted without permission, are forbidden.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.