Heidelminicast Q&A: Isaiah 65, Baptismal Regeneration, and Being Baptized Before Taking the Lord’s Supper?

Call or text the Heidelphone anytime at (760) 618-1563. Leave a message or email us a voice memo from your phone and we may use it in a future podcast. Record it and email it to heidelcast@heidelblog.net. If you benefit from the Heidelcast please leave a five-star review on Apple Podcasts so that others can find it. Please do not forget to make the coffer clink (see the donate button below).

SHOW NOTES

Heidelberg Reformation Association
1637 E. Valley Parkway #391
Escondido CA 92027

The HRA is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization

Subscribe to the Heidelblog today!


3 comments

  1. As someone who was part of a very big non-denominational Church before I became Reformed, I can testify to the growing number of Churches and Christians that do not know some of the basics of the faith, especially in regard to the sacraments.

    At this non-denom, both sacraments were rarely presided over by a minister. Baptism was done by family members or friends that the person being baptized chose and the Lord’s Supper was just laid out and people came up “as they felt called” when the worship leader (not an ordained person) said they were transitioning to a time of Communion. There were no words of institution or prayer, nor any fencing of the table (not even a warning or word about who can partake). One time my uncle even partook as an unbeliever when he was visiting. For the baptisms, there was a surprising number of people who had been Christians for 10-20 years and never got baptized and didn’t see an immediate need to be baptized.

    That’s not to mention teaching and other practices. Sometimes, instead of a sermon, they would do a skit or a play, which was rough. But all that to say, there are a lot of Churches out there that appear to know little about historic Christian practice and doctrine. It is very sad and I praise God that I am able to attend a URCNA Church now. He is good.

  2. At the EPC’s General Assembly this year we discussed adding in the Book of Church Order the language “baptized” rather than “true” believer concerning those invited to the Lord’s Supper. It was an interesting debate and by no means unanimous. It is my argument that adding the “baptism” language makes explicit what should be implicit based on Scripture, church history and our confession. The language would then be less consistent with our confession, more restrictive, and possibly divides or prevents people from taking the Lord’s supper. We all agree the table should be fenced and that the sign of covenant initiation precedes the sign of covenant renewal.

Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments are welcome but must observe the moral law. Comments that are profane, deny the gospel, advance positions contrary to the Reformed confession, or irritate the management are subject to deletion. Anonymous comments, posted without permission, are forbidden.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.