Heidelminicast: It’s A Q&A Emergency On The Sacred/Secular Distinction & Much More

Call or text the Heidelphone anytime at (760) 618-1563. Leave a message or email us a voice memo from your phone and we may use it in a future podcast. Record it and email it to heidelcast@heidelblog.net. If you benefit from the Heidelcast please leave a five-star review on Apple Podcasts so that others can find it. Please do not forget to make the coffer clink (see the donate button below).

SHOW NOTES

Heidelberg Reformation Association
1637 E. Valley Parkway #391
Escondido CA 92027

The HRA is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization

Subscribe to the Heidelblog today!


2 comments

  1. In our congregation, an elder will go to shut-ins accompanied by a few others in the congregation, and they will follow the live stream, which includes communion, the sermon, and singing, basically the whole service. They would partake of communion at home with the elder and a few other congregants.

  2. Dr. Clark (or anyone else who cares),

    I could be off the mark here. But I think people are afraid of the term “secular” because it is synonymous in speech with “secularism.” Words have seemed to change. For example, “gay” doesn’t mean what it meant 100 years ago. If I said, “I feel gay this morning” no one would think I mean to say I’m happy.

    You touched on it a bit, but perhaps a better phrase is a “sacred/common” distinction. That way it doesn’t invoke the same response. Maybe that does not provide the same clarity as “sacred/secular.” Or perhaps “sacred/common” invokes the medieval idea of 2 classes of Christians. Thoughts?

    God bless.

Comments are closed.