Heidelcast: Superfriends Saturday: Does Baptism Save You? | Women Preaching

Call or text the Heidelphone anytime at (760) 618-1563. Leave a message or email us a voice memo from your phone and we may use it in a future podcast. Record it and email it to heidelcast@heidelblog.net. If you benefit from the Heidelcast please leave a five-star review on Apple Podcasts so that others can find it. Please do not forget to make the coffer clink (see the donate button below).

SHOW NOTES

Heidelberg Reformation Association
1637 E. Valley Parkway #391
Escondido CA 92027

The HRA is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization

Subscribe to the Heidelblog today!


4 comments

  1. Dr Clark,
    How can one interpret a passage such as, “And now why do you wait? Rise and be baptized and wash away your sins, calling on his name.” — Acts 22:16

    As I understand the Reformed position, Paul truly does wash away his sins in baptism, calling on Christs name. This is the appeal to God for a good conscience that the Holy Spirit makes effectual to the elect for the forgiveness of sins, regeneration, nourishment, and all other benefits that are signified and sealed. The reprobate receive the sign but not the seal of the Holy Spirit, nor any of the benefits.

    I came to understand how Rome gets this wrong and makes regeneration the sacrament itself and not a benefit which the spirit applies to the elect after reading Micheal Hortons book, Pilgrim Theology in which he states:

    “When the apostles say that baptism saves, we should not rush to qualify their language but allow Scripture to speak in its full covenantal sense. Baptism truly does save—not by any power inherent in the water, nor by the act itself, but because it is the divinely appointed means by which the Holy Spirit unites us to Christ and all his benefits.”

    In summary, can we truly say to someone who has heard the gospel, while being true to Reformed theology and practice, “And now why do you wait? Rise and be baptized and wash away your sins, calling on his name.”

    Sincerely,
    Mr Wood

    • Joshua,

      We interpret such language by recognizing, as we discussed in the episode the nature of sacramental language. I agree with my friend and colleague. We should allow scripture to speak in its full covenantal sense and we are doing that when we recognize the nature of sacramental language or the sacramental (figurative) union between the sacrament and the thing signified (salvation). Baptism isn’t salvation. It is the gospel made visible, that all who believe are washed. That’s a glorious promise. Baptism not only signifies that promise but it seals it. That’s why the catechism says “as surely as the minister” and “just as water washes….”

  2. thank you guys for the clear explanation on baptism, Noah etc. i grew up in oklahoma… english is a second language… ha… ha… the baptist, church of christ brothers and sisters do not know, understand the term figuratively…
    thx again…

Leave a Reply to Joshua Wood Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments are welcome but must observe the moral law. Comments that are profane, deny the gospel, advance positions contrary to the Reformed confession, or that irritate the management are subject to deletion. Anonymous comments, posted without permission, are forbidden. Please use a working email address so we can contact you, if necessary, about content or corrections.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.