- All the Episodes of the Heidelcast
- Subscribe to the Heidelcast!
- On X @Heidelcast
- On Insta & Facebook @Heidelcast
- Subscribe in Apple Podcast
- Subscribe directly via RSS
- Call The Heidelphone via Voice Memo On Your Phone
- The Heidelcast is available wherever podcasts are found including Spotify.
Call or text the Heidelphone anytime at (760) 618-1563. Leave a message or email us a voice memo from your phone and we may use it in a future podcast. Record it and email it to heidelcast@heidelblog.net. If you benefit from the Heidelcast please leave a five-star review on Apple Podcasts so that others can find it. Please do not forget to make the coffer clink (see the donate button below).
SHOW NOTES
- How To Subscribe To Heidelmedia
- Download the HeidelApp on Apple App Store or Google Play
- The Heidelblog Resource Page
- Heidelmedia Resources
- The Ecumenical Creeds
- The Reformed Confessions
- The Heidelberg Catechism
- Recovering the Reformed Confession (Phillipsburg: P&R Publishing, 2008)
- Why I Am A Christian
- What Must A Christian Believe?
- Heidelblog Contributors
- Support Heidelmedia: use the donate button or send a check to:
Heidelberg Reformation Association
1637 E. Valley Parkway #391
Escondido CA 92027The HRA is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization
Heidelcast
The Heidelcast is the official podcast of the Heidelberg Reformation Association. With more than 800 episodes, the Heidelcast has been in production since 2009.
More by Heidelcast ›
I think the Westminster Standards also reflect Irish Reformed theology in addition to English and Scottish. They used the Irish Articles as a source document. Joshua Hoyle was prof at Trinity College Dublin, who represented that school at the assembly. He contributed to several important committees to develop the standards. The Larger Catechism seems to reflect a lot of material from James Ussher’s Body of Divinity.
Just my take!
I have an idea about from where meta AI got its information. It probably didn’t get its information from anywhere. The way meta AI and chat GPT and other AI bots like that work is that they are trying to use information to come up with something new. they’re not a very good research tool for this reason. often, they will have “hallucinations” where they make something up out of whole cloth.
I have asked chat GPT on different occasions for information about what Calvin for some other writer thought about something, and it has gone something like:
Me: does Calvin say anything about x?
GPT: Calvin said _____ in his Book 4 chapter 5 of the Institutes.
Me: I just looked there and it doesn’t say that
GPT: You are correct! He says it in his commentary on y.
Me: No he doesn’t.
GPT: My apologies. You are correct. Calvin does not address this topic anywhere.
so it makes up whole quotes and even makes up titles of books that it attributes to various authors.
Wow. That’s not good at all.
I’m not a great reader of Science Fiction but I’ve read and seen enough to know how this turns out.
It’s to a point where I’ll see a video online and immediately wonder if it’s real or AI generated.