Jonathan Edwards (1703–58) is one of the most important figures in the history of American religion. He is arguably one of the greatest intellects in the history of America but he is equally controversial. Below are a series of essays and quotations and lectures on Edwards which represent something of a dissenting interpretation of Edwards.
- Richard Muller—Jonathan Edwards And The Absence Of Free Choice: A Parting Of Ways In The Reformed Tradition
- Godfrey: Edwards Rejected The Reformed Definition Of Faith In The Act Of Justification
- “Edwards Injects Into Faith” In The Act Of Justification The Virtues Of The Christian Life
- Warfield On Faith Contra The Edwardsian Definition
- Sarah Edwards’ Encounters With The Divine (Or Neglected Aspects Of The First Great Awakening)
- Crisp: Edwards Was A Panentheist
- More On Edwards, Affections, Romanticism, And Pantheism
- Criticizing Edwards On Religious Affections Does Not Lead To Dead Orthodoxy: There Is Another Way
- Why Caution About Jonathan Edwards Is In Order
- Helm Replies to Lucas on the Nature of “Affections” in Edwards
- Paul Helm on Edwards’ Religious Affections
- Second and Third Thoughts on Edwards
- Resources on Revival
- Resources On Reformed Piety
- Resources On Church Growth And Ordinary Means Ministry
- Resources on the Means of Grace
- Resources On Prayer
MORE RESOURCES
- Subscribe to the Heidelblog
- The Heidelblog Resource Page
- Heidelmedia Resources
- The Ecumenical Creeds
- The Reformed Confessions
- The Heidelberg Catechism
- Recovering the Reformed Confession (Phillipsburg: P&R Publishing, 2008)
- Why I Am A Christian
- What Must A Christian Believe?
- Heidelblog Contributors
- Support Heidelmedia: use the donate button or send a check to
Heidelberg Reformation Association
1637 E. Valley Parkway #391
Escondido CA 92027
USA
The HRA is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization.