Jonathan Edwards (1703–58) is almost certainly the most influential and significant theologian in American history. He was at the headwaters of the First Great Awakening in 18th century colonial America and was briefly (about a month) president of what would become Princeton University just before his death (due to the smallpox vaccine). He is the theologian of the Young, Restless, and Reformed movement. Almost everything Edwards wrote has had influence far beyond the 18th century. Thus, for these reasons and many others, it is a delight to have received the audio of Richard Muller’s 2010 lecture on Edwards’ revision of the Reformed doctrine of free choice.
The reader and the listener should understand that what is being discussed here is not the question of what is sometimes called libertarian free will, i.e., the ability of humans to will contrary to God’s will or his decree. Rather, what is being discussed is the nature of the uncoerced (by creatures) choices that humans make. Contrary to the caricature often drawn, the Reformed taught the reality of human free (uncoerced) choice. The question here is how Edwards received and modified the Reformed tradition.
Dr. Richard Muller was the P. J. Zondervan Professor of Historical Theology at Calvin Seminary and before that he taught historical theology at Fuller Seminary. You can find a reasonably complete bibliography of his publications here. This lecture was delivered at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School (TEDS), under the auspices of the Jonathan Edwards Center. It was the inaugural lecture in the series, New Directions in Edwards Studies.
Thanks to HB contributor Jacob Aitken for sending us the audio.
- How To Subscribe To Heidelmedia
- The Heidelblog Resource Page
- Heidelmedia Resources
- The Ecumenical Creeds
- The Reformed Confessions
- The Heidelberg Catechism
- Recovering the Reformed Confession (Phillipsburg: P&R Publishing, 2008)
- Why I Am A Christian
- Support Heidelmedia: use the donate button
- Resources on Reformed Scholasticism
- Muller: Rethinking The Relation Between Kuyper, Bavinck, And Scholasticism
- Muller: According To Reformed Theology, Pagan Philosophy Knows God Naturally But Not As Redeemer
- Muller On The Relations Between Reformed And Medieval Theology
- Muller: Sola Scriptura Was Essential To The Development Of Reformed Theology
- Muller: What I Haven’t Learned From Karl Barth
- Muller: The Reformed Affirmed Eternal Generation Against The Socinians
- Muller On The History Of The Exegesis Of Hosea 6:7
- Muller On Reformed Orthodoxy On Double Procession And The Filioque
- Muller: Utterly Unwarranted To Conclude Against Ordo Salutis
- Muller on Calvin’s Doctrine of Union with Christ Through Faith
Even though Muller got a lot of pushback from this lecture by proponents of Edwards, to me it was always quite clear: did Edwards hold to the distinction between necessity of the consequent and necessity of the consequences? If he did, it is not clear.
And though this is above my intellectual paygrade, it is worth wondering whether Edwards’ view of determinism allows for secondary causes “to fall out by necessity, freely, or contingently.”
Perhaps most troubling, as Oliver Crisp noted, Edwards view of continuous creation in Original Sin is at odds with his view of causality and determinism in Freedom of the Will.
Thank you. I found that to be an extremely clear presentation. Is there a transcript available?
Yes, I think it has been published. See this bibliography.
Here is another source in PDF format:
http://edwards.yale.edu/files/RA Muller JES vol.1 no.1.pdf
Here is a working link to Muller’s article.