- Waters: Piper Must Choose Between Edwards And The Reformation On The Definition Of Saving Faithby Heidelblog on May 1, 2026
- Why Caution About Jonathan Edwards Is In Orderby R. Scott Clark on February 18, 2026
- Heidelminicast: The St Nicholas Of Historyby Heidelcast on December 25, 2023
- Heidelminicast Q&A: What Should Confessional Reformed Christians Think Of Edwards?by Heidelcast on December 21, 2023
- Richard Muller—Jonathan Edwards And The Absence Of Free Choice: A Parting Of Ways In The Reformed Traditionby R. Scott Clark on August 9, 2022
- Godfrey: Edwards Rejected The Reformed Definition Of Faith In The Act Of Justificationby Heidelblog on June 8, 2022
- With Presbycast On Revival, Revivalism, And What Does “Evangelical” Mean?by R. Scott Clark on May 20, 2022
- “Edwards Injects Into Faith” In The Act Of Justification The Virtues Of The Christian Lifeby Heidelblog on May 18, 2022
- Warfield On Faith Contra The Edwardsian Definitionby B. B. Warfield, Heidelblog on May 9, 2022
- Piper’s New Book Is Edwardsianby Heidelblog on May 6, 2022
- John Piper, Future Grace: The Purifying Power of the Promises of God, rev. ed. (New York: Multnomah, 2012)—A Thorough Reviewby Harrison Perkins on September 13, 2021
- The Myth Of The Bell Ropeby R. Scott Clark on March 2, 2021
- The First Great Awakening: “A Confus’d But Very Affecting Noise”by R. Scott Clark on March 1, 2021
- Crisp: Edwards Was A Panentheistby R. Scott Clark on December 30, 2020
- More On Edwards, Affections, Romanticism, And Pantheismby R. Scott Clark on December 30, 2020
- Criticizing Edwards On Religious Affections Does Not Lead To Dead Orthodoxy: There Is Another Wayby R. Scott Clark on December 29, 2020
- Helm Replies to Lucas on the Nature of “Affections” in Edwardsby R. Scott Clark on April 12, 2011
- Paul Helm on Edwards’ Religious Affectionsby Heidelblog on April 1, 2011
- Second and Third Thoughts on Edwardsby R. Scott Clark on May 4, 2010
- A Review, Response, and Rejoinder (and Surrejoinder)by R. Scott Clark on August 4, 2009
