Waters: Piper Must Choose Between Edwards And The Reformation On The Definition Of Saving Faith

By way of preface, it is important to underscore the Reformational convictions in WSF that Piper repeatedly affirms – the sinner is justified through faith alone apart from works; faith is purely receptive in justification; the sinner is justified solely on the basis of Christ’s righteousness; justifying righteousness is imputed to the sinner and received through faith alone; neither our love to God nor our love to human beings is justifying. These convictions are sincerely held and WSF in no way is attempting to overturn, much less to undermine, them.

But it must be also said that WSF’s thesis that saving faith is essentially affectional, and the arguments advanced in support of that thesis, are unable to sustain the weight of Piper’s Reformational convictions. We may see this dynamic by pursuing two complementary lines of reflection. First, the thesis of WSF is not proven. Second, the thesis of WSF raises a significant problem.

First, the thesis of WSF is not proven. That is to say, WSF fails to establish its thesis from the texts of Scripture that are brought forward to support it. The burden that WSF shoulders is to demonstrate that treasuring Christ (delighting in Christ, loving Christ) is an element of saving faith, not merely a fruit, evidence, or accompaniment of saving faith. Read more»

Guy Waters, “Faith and Treasuring Christ: A Review Article,” Reformed Faith and Practice, vol. 8, issue 1 (2023)


RESOURCES

Heidelberg Reformation Association
1637 E. Valley Parkway #391
Escondido CA 92027
USA
The HRA is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization


    Post authored by:

  • Heidelblog
    Author Image

    The Heidelblog has been in publication since 2007. It is devoted to recovering the Reformed confession and to helping others discover Reformed theology, piety, and practice.

    More by Heidelblog ›

Subscribe to the Heidelblog today!


5 comments

  1. Seems Piper doesn’t think about faith loveapart from affections. Nor is he considering different types of those who have faith. I’ll admit I’m a sensitive guy,I may have more emotions related to faith than others. But a rough neck, someone in special forces in the military probably won’t.
    That doesn’t mean they don’t have faith. I’ve been around long enough to understand that lots of men in his position want to be the standard. I love Jesus this much and you should too or you might not be saved. I think i was one of those guys myself once. I thought everyone should be like me.

    • Victor,

      Piper’s approach, as Guy says, wants to avoid the Roman error of making affections, which, in this context, means change more than feelings (although it involves feelings) but it fails to do so. It becomes “faith formed by love” (obedience).

Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments are welcome but must observe the moral law. Comments that are profane, deny the gospel, advance positions contrary to the Reformed confession, or that irritate the management are subject to deletion. Anonymous comments, posted without permission, are forbidden. Please use a working email address so we can contact you, if necessary, about content or corrections.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.