To the nomist, any anti-nomist seems antinomian because guilt, grace, and gratitude (i.e., the Heidelberg Catechism) is not enough.
©R. Scott Clark. All Rights Reserved.
Resources
- How To Subscribe To Heidelmedia
- The Heidelblog Resource Page
- Heidelmedia Resources
- The Ecumenical Creeds
- The Reformed Confessions
- The Heidelberg Catechism
- Recovering the Reformed Confession (Phillipsburg: P&R Publishing, 2008)
- Why I Am A Christian
- Support Heidelmedia: use the donate button
- Heidelcast Series: Nomism And Antinomianism
- A Listener Explains The Benefit Of The Heidelcast Series On Nomism And Antinomianism
- Resources On The Marrow Controversy
- Marshall: The Moralists Try To Put Us Back Under The Covenant Of Works Because They Do Not Understand The Gospel Mystery Of Sanctification
- Walter Marshall’s Antidote To Nomism
- How Not To Respond To Antinomianism Or Nomism
- Antinomianism Is A Serious Error And So Is Nomism
- Why The Marrow Still Matters: Recovering The Reformation
- “The Marrow Was Birthed To Avoid Legalism And Antinomianism”
- Heidelminicast: Heidelberg Catechism 64—Does Justification Sola Fide Lead To Antinomianism?
- Does The Twofold Kingdom License Antinomianism Etc?
- With Presbycast On Gospel, Grace, Antinomianism, FV, Moscow, And More
- Lloyd-Jones On Antinomianism
- A Gospel-Double-Decker Not A Law-Sandwich
- Paul Was A Gospel Man
- My Pilgrimage From “Lordship” to Law/Gospel (part 3): Assurance
Even within Confessional Reformed fellowships, it is as if the confessions are optional when discerning antinomians from orthodox Christians. Without consideration for Belgic 31 or the 9th commandment.