To the nomist, any anti-nomist seems antinomian because guilt, grace, and gratitude (i.e., the Heidelberg Catechism) is not enough.

©R. Scott Clark. All Rights Reserved.

Resources

• How To Subscribe To Heidelmedia
• The Heidelblog Resource Page
• Heidelmedia Resources
• The Ecumenical Creeds
• The Reformed Confessions
• The Heidelberg Catechism
• Recovering the Reformed Confession (Phillipsburg: P&R Publishing, 2008)
• Why I Am A Christian
• Support Heidelmedia: use the donate button
• Heidelcast Series: Nomism And Antinomianism
• A Listener Explains The Benefit Of The Heidelcast Series On Nomism And Antinomianism
• Resources On The Marrow Controversy
• Marshall: The Moralists Try To Put Us Back Under The Covenant Of Works Because They Do Not Understand The Gospel Mystery Of Sanctification
• Walter Marshall’s Antidote To Nomism
• How Not To Respond To Antinomianism Or Nomism
• Antinomianism Is A Serious Error And So Is Nomism
• Why The Marrow Still Matters: Recovering The Reformation
• “The Marrow Was Birthed To Avoid Legalism And Antinomianism”
• Heidelminicast: Heidelberg Catechism 64—Does Justification Sola Fide Lead To Antinomianism?
• Does The Twofold Kingdom License Antinomianism Etc?
• With Presbycast On Gospel, Grace, Antinomianism, FV, Moscow, And More
• Lloyd-Jones On Antinomianism
• A Gospel-Double-Decker Not A Law-Sandwich
• Paul Was A Gospel Man
• My Pilgrimage From “Lordship” to Law/Gospel (part 3): Assurance

Post authored by:

• R. Scott Clark

  

  R.Scott Clark is the President of the Heidelberg Reformation Association, the author and editor of, and contributor to several books and the author of many articles. He is professor emeritus of church history and historical theology at Westminster Seminary California, where he taught for 29 years. He also taught at Wheaton College, Reformed Theological Seminary, and Concordia University. He has hosted the Heidelblog since 2007 and the Heidelcast since 2009.

  More by R. Scott Clark ›