8 comments

  1. Something lost in this discussion of racism: where does an understandable love of one’s own end, and a dangerous, hateful racism begin? This was driven home to me when I married and started my family while living in Taiwan. You can and should adjust to your host culture as far as loyalty to the Word of God allows. But, you can’t lose completely the heritage into which you were born.

    • I think Paul uses this idea in 1 Timothy 5:8. You still have obligations to your household even if they are not believers. The obligation to one’s nation is found in Romans 9-11 where Paul wishes he could be cursed for the sake of his natural Jewish family. He hints that God will graft the natural family of Abraham back in at the end of the epoch, so even God cares about it.

      Historically, you had natural obligations in multiple spheres, including to your family and nation. It would sounds strange to an ancient person to discard all natural relations and obligations when they became Christians. Christians in other countries understand this. Bluecheck elite evangelicals do not.

  2. Good post!
    It’s a twist of irony that the social justice warriors have more in common with Kinists than not. It would not surprise me if interracial marriage starts being frowned upon by such people soon.

  3. I think the over 600,000 Union soldiers who died or were wounded in the Civil War might have a somewhat different perspective.

  4. Here’s are some excerpts from PCA TE Randy Nabors’ position paper on integrated churches, published in PCA RE Mark Belz’s book Every Precious Stone, available on Amazon.

    3. White people as a group are indicted for America’s racism (pg 183)

    We confess that in the history of our country the Indian, Black, Oriental, immigrant, and Jew have all been oppressed at various times and in various ways. The majority race, in our country – specifically white people (some who even have attempted to name themselves Christians) – have consciously enslaved, sold, exploited, raped, murdered, and denied freedom and personhood to people of color. We confess that people of color, especially black people, have been deprived of their human rights.

    We admit that although there were some white people who did not engage in this oppression personally (some even struggled to champion the cause of freedom and died in the attempt) that all white people benefited from this system. This was for the simple reason that they could enjoy the benefits of living in a white society, by simply being white. This makes all white people responsible for their actions and attitudes concerning this historical situation. Either white people will be complicit with the system, or they will attempt to change it. There is no neutral ground.

    14. Demand for the negation of whiteness as superior or equal. (pg 190)

    We accept the fact that for white Christians to be able to join together with black Christians to build a specific local congregation, they must in a very real sense give up their “whiteness.” As they cannot change the color of their skin, which would be even a wrong inner desire, they must change the way they think and act. They must be willing, and practicing, aggressively to take a back seat. They must be servant. They must not let their culture dominate.

    15. Whiteness as opportunity for servanthood. (pg 191)

    It would be wrong for a white person to think that somehow they could be black. That by the way they sing, act, walk, talk or dress, that somehow black people will not recognize them. God makes us what we are, and he does not err. We should be thankful for what God has made us. However, our context defines our opportunity. White people have the opportunity to be servants.

Comments are closed.