The Heidelblog

Search

Primary Menu

Skip to content
  • About
    • R. Scott Clark
    • Heidelmedia
    • Heidelblog Resources
    • Heidelblog Contributors
    • Categories
    • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • The Heidelcast
  • Books & Essays

judicial laws

Audio: Fesko on What to Do with the "Stoning" Passage?

by R. Scott Clark on November 4, 2009 | 2 Comments

One of the things that offends modernist sensibilities is the law in Deuteronomy 21 that requires the stoning of incorrigibly rebellious children. On the other side we face the theonomic call to reinstitute some version of this law in post-canonical civil law. . . . Continue reading →

Categorized Heidelstuff | Tagged Deut 21, John Fesko, judicial laws, stoning | 2 Comments

Westminster Confession On The Threefold Distinction In The Law And The Abrogation Of The Mosaic Judicial Laws

by R. Scott Clark on June 30, 2017

3. Beside this law, commonly called moral, God was pleased to give to the people of Israel, as a church under age, ceremonial laws, containing several typical ordinances, partly of worship, prefiguring Christ, his graces, actions, sufferings, and benefits; and partly, holding . . . Continue reading →

It Was The Anabaptist Karlstadt Not The Confessional Protestants Who Taught Theonomy

by R. Scott Clark on January 18, 2020

The [New Testament] does not introduce any new laws about the civil estate, but commands us to obey the existing laws, whether they were formulated by heathen or by others, and in this obedience to practice love. It was mad of Carlstadt . . . Continue reading →

Boston: The Judicial Laws Were Temporary. The Moral Law Is Permanent

by R. Scott Clark on January 18, 2020

Secondly, There are three sorts of laws we find in the word. 1. The ceremonial law, which was given by Moses. This bound only the Jews, and that to the coming of Christ, by whom it was abrogated, being a shadow of . . . Continue reading →

Witsius: Christians Have Been Liberated From the Mosaic Judicial Laws

by R. Scott Clark on January 18, 2020 | 1 Comment

XIX. That liberty, therefore, which is peculiar to the New Testament is, 1st. A discharge from the bondage of the elements of the world, or of the ancient ceremonies, from whose religious obligation, as of things necessary, the consciences of men were . . . Continue reading →

Gillespie And Piscator: The Natural Law Remains In Force

by R. Scott Clark on January 18, 2020

But how doth it appear that these or any other Judicial Laws of Moses do at all appertain to us, as rules to guide us in like cases? I shall with him who scrupleth this, to read Piscator his Appendix to his . . . Continue reading →

Samuel Rutherford Contra Theonomy On General Equity

by R. Scott Clark on February 29, 2020 | 2 Comments

Judicial laws may be judicial and Mosaical, and so not obligatory to us, according to the degree and quality of punishment, such as in Deuteronomy 13, the destroying the city, and devoting all therein to a curse; we may not do the . . . Continue reading →

Samuel Rutherford: “The Whole Bulk Of The Judicial Laws…Is Expired”

by R. Scott Clark on February 29, 2020 | 2 Comments

That this Author saith, God commanded those that transgressed his holy Law with an high hand, and presumptuously to be killed, lest they should live and profane his holy things; I defend not: But sure Erastus erreth, who will have all such . . . Continue reading →

The Heidelblog
The Heidelcast

Subscribe to the Heidelblog today!

Recent Comments

  • R. Scott Clark on The Gospel According To John (MacArthur)—Part 14
  • R. Scott Clark on Heidelcast For Sep 24, 2023: Sin, Salvation, & Service: The Threefold Truth Of Romans (35)
  • JP on Heidelcast For Sep 24, 2023: Sin, Salvation, & Service: The Threefold Truth Of Romans (35)
  • Mary on Made For Worship: A Series In Psalm 100 (Part 1)—Shout Joyfully
  • Victor on The Gospel According To John (MacArthur)—Part 14

Resources

  • Welcome to the Heidelblog!
  • Books and Essays
  • R. Scott Clark
  • Contact
  • Archives
  • Categories
  • Using the HB Effectively
  • What Must A Christian Believe?
  • Heidelblog Resources
  • Discovering The Reformed Confession
  • Heidelberg Catechism (1563)
  • Top HB Posts Through The Years
  • The Ecumenical Creeds
  • The Reformed Confessions
  • Belgic Confession (1561)
  • Canons Of Dort (1619)
  • Heidelberg Reformation Association
  • The Heidelcast
  • The Heidelberg Catechism Podcast
  • Resources On The Heidelberg Catechism (1563)
  • Heidelblog Contributors
  • The Canons Of Dork
  • Subscribe To The Heidelblog!
  • Covenant Theology And Infant Baptism
  • Heidelmedia Archive
  • Calvin’s Inventory Of Relics
  • Resources On Pilgrim Theology
  • Heidelmedia
  • Resources On Spiritual, Physical, And Sexual Abuse In The Church
  • Great Lakes Reformed Conference Oct 14, 2023

The “Ruformation” Continues: Heideldog 2

The Heidelblog

Tags

Baptism calvin Canons of Dort Christ and Culture Christology civil liberties covenant of grace covenant of works Covenant Theology d. g. hart Defining “Reformed” Eschatology evangelicalism Federal Vision free speech Gospel Grace Heidelberg Catechism Heidelcast Hermeneutics Justification law and gospel LGBTQ Machen Ministry Natural Law Office Hours Pastoral Ministry pca piety political correctness Recovering the Reformed Confession reformation regulative principle religious freedom religious liberty Romanism rule of worship salvation Sanctification Sola Fide Sola Gratia Sola Scriptura Twofold Kingdom Worship
The Heidelcast
Proudly powered by WordPress


Copyright © 2023 R. Scott Clark. All Rights Reserved. The Heidelberg Reformation Association is a tax-exempt 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. Federal ID number available upon request. Hosted by Kinsta.