Heidelminicast: Superfriends Saturday: Psalms Set to Modern Musical Interpretation and the Boundaries of the Regulative Principle of Worship

Call or text the Heidelphone anytime at (760) 618-1563. Leave a message or email us a voice memo from your phone and we may use it in a future podcast. Record it and email it to heidelcast@heidelblog.net. If you benefit from the Heidelcast please leave a five-star review on Apple Podcasts so that others can find it. Please do not forget to make the coffer clink (see the donate button below).

SHOW NOTES

Heidelberg Reformation Association
1637 E. Valley Parkway #391
Escondido CA 92027

The HRA is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization

Subscribe to the Heidelblog today!


7 comments

  1. Gentlemen, I am rolling my eyes. The present St Paul’s Cathedral was commissioned (along with all the other City churches designed by Wren) to replace Old St Paul’s which was destroyed in the Fire of 1666.

  2. Around the 25:00 mark you mention a “young man” who put all 150 Psalms to music. Could you please share those songs with us through a link or otherwise? Thank you.

  3. As always: great episode and topic! I would love to have Pr McDermott’s input as well, as we can all guess he would have great input! I’m new to the PCA (formally in March 2026) and think I long for primacy of psalms (singing) in worship (let alone “a cappella”), however I would prefer directly out of the Bible translation we read from (ESV), just so it is easier to memorize scripture. Although, I know if/when contemporary revisions of translations are necessary, it may change the meter of a tune (melody).
    There will always be “pros and cons” with adapting contemporary melodies to scripture, as even a “tune” can distract us: I recall hearing a hymn that I would swear was to “Ah! vous dirai-je, maman.” (Twinkle little star, Baa Baa Black Sheep, Alphabet Song, etc) Which in turn made me focus on trying to guess why the tune was so familiar. 😅
    I personally think the only instrument should be piano, only for melodic accompaniment: no long intro, no interludes/solos, etc. I also would rather hear the congregation sing versus a “choir” or “team”. But in our Western society with a lack of formal musical training and our “reserved” attitude (fear) about public speaking, let alone public singing, I think the average congregant finds it challenging to sing: a melody they may not be familiar with, words they are unfamiliar with, and potentially people they are unfamiliar with – all focusing on themselves instead of the one who they are there to worship.
    Anyone been part of a congregation that had a weekly “sing” fellowship (like a Bible study with singing practice in preparation for a psalm for the month/week)?

Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments are welcome but must observe the moral law (Matt 22:37–40). Comments that are profane, that deny the moral law, that deny the gospel, that advance positions contrary to the Reformed confession, or that irritate the management are subject to deletion. Please use a working email address so we can contact you, if necessary, about content or corrections.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.