XXV. Next follow the actions of the disciples, and consequently of the other guests. And these, according to Christ’s appointment, are three: first, to receive both the bread and the cup; but each separately, for so Christ distributed them: in this manner he commanded his people to take them; thus the body of Christ, as broken for us; his blood as poured out of his body, are more distinctly represented; and in fine, as a complete entertainment requires both meat and drink, so this most complete spiritual repast which we have in Christ, is thus most excellently represented. And therefore we cannot so well approve of that custom which prevailed in Cyprian’s time, to give a piece of bread dipt in wine to infants and the sick; which was the practice in some places, about the year of Christ 340, in the public and ordinary celebration of the sacrament. The same judgment we are to pass on the custom of the Greeks, who crumble the consecrated bread into the wine, and take it out with a spoon.
Herman Witsius, The Economy of the Covenants between God and Man: Comprehending a Complete Body of Divinity, trans. William Crookshank, vol. 2 (London: T. Tegg & Son, 1837), 4.17.27 (2.452). HT: Amy Warren.
Resources
- How To Subscribe To Heidelmedia
- How to support Heidelmedia: use the donate button below
- Heidelblog Resources
- Heidelmedia
- Prima Facie Evidence Against Intinction
- Intinction Has Led To Removal Of The Cup From The Laity
- With Presbycast On The Christian Sabbath And Intinction
- NW Georgia Presbytery (PCA) Denies Theistic Evolution and Intinction
- Lane Keister, “Intinction: An Historical, Exegetical, and Systematic-Theological Examination,” Mid-America Journal of Theology 29 (2018): 149–172.
- Owen Gives Us Theological Reasons To Object To Intinction