Recently I talked with Matthew and Onnig of the Back to the Reformation podcast about the value of the Reformation for contemporary evangelical churches, about what biblicism is (hint: it does not mean “to be biblical”), about American religious history and the strange and strained relations between American evangelical Christianity and the Reformation, about the ordinary means of grace (not magic), about revivalism, about how the Nicene Creed would have helped us avoid the confusion surrounding the so-called doctrine of the “Eternal Subordination of the Son,” about the current controversy over final justification through works, about the importance of distinguishing law and gospel, and does the emphasis on the ordained means by which God works lead us away from daily prayer and Bible reading.

Here is the interview.

In case the link is broken here is the Heidelblog media archive version.

Resources

• • One Way To Escape Biblicism
  • How To Avoid Biblicism
  • Biblicism: A Trojan Horse Full Of Rationalism
  • The Difference Between Sola Scriptura And Biblicism
  • In Defense Of Creedalism
  • Why the Focus on the Confessions?
  • Resources On The Controversy Over “Final Salvation Through Works”

Post authored by:

• R. Scott Clark

  

  R.Scott Clark is the President of the Heidelberg Reformation Association, the author and editor of, and contributor to several books and the author of many articles. He has taught church history and historical theology since 1997 at Westminster Seminary California. He has also taught at Wheaton College, Reformed Theological Seminary, and Concordia University. He has hosted the Heidelblog since 2007.

  More by R. Scott Clark ›