God’s covenant is a bargain which God hath made with men, in which God promises to men some good, and requires of them again, that they perform those things which he commands.
And that covenant is either eternal or temporal.
The eternal covenant is a covenant in which God promises men eternal life.
And that is twofold: the covenant of works or the covenant of grace.
The covenant of works, is a bargain of God made with men concerning eternal life, to which is both a condition of perfect obedience adjoined, to be performed by man, and also a threatening of eternal death if he shall not perform perfect obedience. Gen. 2. 17.
The repetition of the covenant of works is made by God, Exod. 19. 5. Deut. 5. 2. 1. King. 8. 21. Heb. 8. 9. and that chiefly for four causes.
- That God by all means might stir up men to perform obedience.
- That every mouth might be stopped, and all the world might be made subject to the condemnation of God for not performing perfect obedience. Rom. 3. 19.
- That he might manifest mans sin, and naughtiness. Rom. 3. 19. 20. and 7. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11.
- That he might thrust us forward to seek to be restored in the covenant of grace. Gal. 3. 22. and 5. 23.
—Amandus Polanus (1561–1610), The Substance of Christian Religion, trans. E. W. (London, 1595), 87–88. [Spelling modernized]
Is he asserting that the CoW was re-instated at Sinai or is he referring to the 3 Uses of the Law?
Andy,
1. This phrase “The repetition of the covenant of works” and others like it was used frequently by the Reformed in the 16th and 17th centuries. E.g., Witsius wrote just this way as did Robert Rollock, and Wm Cooper. Perkins seems to imply as much also.
Here is a library of posts on this topic.
2. Polanus wrote that the “covenant of works” was repeated at Sinai. As Westminster Confession 19.6 says, the 3rd use of the law is not a covenant of works.
The 3rd use refers to the function of the law as the norm for believers as they, in the covenant of grace (not a covenant of works), seek to glorify God and to show gratitude for his grace. There is an pedagogical function, however, of the law whereby believers, in the covenant of works, are reminded of the greatness of their sin and misery:
The historical reality was that versions of republication were commonplace in Reformed theology the 16th and 17th centuries.
3. Arguably, as Thomas Boston and others saw it, this way of speaking is the background to the decision of the Westminster Divines to repeat almost verbatim the language of ch. 7 in ch. 19.
The phrase “this law,” in 19.2 seems necessarily to refer back to that which was described in 19.1 “a law, as a covenant of works,…”.
The divines wrote this way with the expectation that everyone would understand what they were saying since it was so widely taught in the period.