Whereas even prior to the establishment of constitutional documents in American Presbyterianism, American Presbyterians utilized the Westminster Form of Government and Directory for Public Worship, as adopted by the Synod of Philadelphia in 1729, thereby affirming the historic practice of ordering worship according to biblical and confessional principles;
Whereas all schisms within American Presbyterianism, including the Old Side–New Side division and the Old School–New School division, continued to use a Directory for Worship, demonstrating the enduring commitment to a biblically regulated and
confessional approach to public worship;
Whereas in 1789, the newly organized Presbyterian Church in the United States of America (PCUSA) formally adopted a revised Directory for Worship, which was continued in usage throughout subsequent denominational developments, including the formation of the Presbyterian Church in the Confederate States (PCCSA) in 1861 and the Presbyterian Church in the United States (PCUS) in 1865, and later maintained by the Presbyterian Church in America (PCA) as part of its Book of Church Order in 1973;
Whereas the Westminster Confession of Faith explicitly affirms that the Church has the authority to establish a Directory for Worship, provided that it commands only what is taught in Scripture and applies Christian prudence and the light of nature to circumstances of worship, as stated in Westminster Confession of Faith 1.6, 20.2, and 31.3;
Whereas the Constitution is defined as including the Directory for Worship (Preface III, BCO 26-1) with the BCO assuming the usefulness of the Directory for Worship; and
Whereas consideration of adopting a Directory for Worship was delayed at the First General Assembly until the Third General Assembly; and
Whereas the Third General Assembly placed a temporary preface to the Directory for Worship stating it “does not have the force of law” that was to be in place “until a more precise statement can be prepared by the Constitutional Documents Committee”; and
Whereas the Constitutional Documents Committee never finally reported and was dismissed in 1978; and
Whereas the 1980 General Assembly tasked the Permanent Committee on Judicial Business to re-write the Directory for Worship; and
Whereas these Committees failed to achieve the original goal of an authoritative Directory for Worship beyond chapters 56-58; and
Whereas the Session is charged to order worship “in accordance with the Directory for Worship” in BCO 12-5.e; and Whereas the current Directory for Worship is greatly neglected due to its lack of constitutionality (except chapters 56, 57, 58, and section 59-3); and
Whereas the current Directory for Worship is neglected due to being perceived as antiquated, or over-prescriptive; and
Whereas a Directory for Worship gives needed guidance without the overprescription of a prayerbook, and
Whereas our lack of an official Directory for Worship is unique and peculiar among orthodox and confessional Presbyterian denominations; and
Whereas an updated Directory for Worship would be a great help to Sessions in ordering worship as well as a basis for biblical unity in the church (Ephesians 4); and
Whereas Scripture commands the worship of God (Psalm 95:6, Psalm 100, Psalm 122:1, John 4:24, Hebrews 12:22-24, Revelation 4:8, 19:10), and that the believers ought to worship in a decent and orderly manner (1 Corinthians 14:40), Therefore, be it resolved that the Northwest Georgia Presbytery hereby overtures the 52nd General Assembly to
1. Form an ad hoc committee to finish the work of revising the “Directory for the Worship of God” not yet given full authority, in accordance with Scripture and the Westminster Standards, for authoritative use in the Presbyterian Church in America (PCA) according to the rules of the Book of Church Order,
a. Utilizing the various NAPARC denominations’ Directories of Public Worship as a guide
b. Including Scriptural and confessional References
c. Present various chapters to the General Assembly for adoption until their work is complete
Adopted by the Northwest Georgia Presbytery | April 1, 2025
RESOURCES
- Subscribe To The Heidelblog!
- Download the HeidelApp on Apple App Store or Google Play
- Browse the Heidelshop!
- The Heidelblog Resource Page
- Heidelmedia Resources
- The Ecumenical Creeds
- The Reformed Confessions
- The Heidelberg Catechism
- The Heidelberg Catechism: A Historical, Theological, & Pastoral Commentary (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2025)
- Recovering the Reformed Confession (Phillipsburg: P&R Publishing, 2008)
- Why I Am A Christian
- What Must A Christian Believe?
- Heidelblog Contributors
- Support Heidelmedia: use the donate button or send a check to
Heidelberg Reformation Association
1637 E. Valley Parkway #391
Escondido CA 92027
USA
The HRA is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization
An honest question: Given the wide diversity of worship in the current PCA, which quite possibly is far greater than it was when the PCA was organized and the decision was made not to undertake this project, will this not end up simply “legalizing” most though perhaps not quite all of the existing diversity?
If the goal is to address specific abuses, which from what I’m reading of PCA controversies appears to be the case, would it not be better to address those specific abuses on which there is widespread agreement that they are wrong, rather than trying to adopt a prescriptive Directory of Worship which is very unlikely to please theological conservatives once it is finished?
The confessional approach to public worship is a significant step towards unity and clarity in Reformed practices. Utilizing the NAPARC directories and including Scriptural references ensures a solid foundation for worship. Presenting chapters to the General Assembly for adoption shows a commitment to thoroughness and accountability. May this effort lead to a more consistent and God-honoring worship experience across congregations. What specific changes are anticipated in the revised Directories of Public Worship?
This is a very thoughtful and detailed approach to public worship. Utilizing confessional references seems like a solid foundation for guiding worship practices. It’s encouraging to see the efforts of the NW Georgia Presbytery in refining these standards. I wonder how these changes will be received across different congregations and traditions. What specific revisions are being considered for the Directories of Public Worship?
This has the potential to be quite remarkable. One of the complaints I had when I was a PCA member is that, when traveling, I didn’t know if I was going to get a high-church-quasi-Anglican service, a Baptist-lite (but we baptize infants) service, or a squishy-evangelical-seeker-friendly service. My prayers are with the NW Georgia Presbytery and the General Assembly as they take this overture under advisement.
This seems to be wonderful news, though I did not read the legal details and I am unsure of what revisions they are planning to make… I really appreciate the original DPW.
May God bless the NW Georgia presbytery’s efforts. May the results be an increase of sweet, pure, disciplined, and humble glory given to God in many congregations throughout America.