Distinguo!

Among the Reformed, distinctions were a vital tool for proper theology. Johannes Maccovius (1588–1644), Reformed scholastic theologian and delegate to the Synod of Dordt (1618–19), wrote an entire work dedicated to distinctions: A Hundredfold Most General Distinctions. Maccovius stood on the shoulders of his scholastic forebears because he believed that distinctions were necessary to determine agreement, difference, and perspicuity in theological discourse. Such a methodology stretches back to the Middle Ages and was employed by theologians throughout their systems. For example, John Duns Scotus (ca. 1266–1308) created two categories of distinctions, formal and real. A real distinction (distinctio realis) is a difference between two or more independent things, whereas a formal distinction (distinctio formalis) identifies formal aspects of a single thing, such as intellect and will, which are not separate but distinguishable. Important to note here is that a formal distinction is not a real distinction. In other words, a formal distinction merely observes aspects of a unified object; it does not separate them, because they are inseparable given their existence in a single object. In this respect, theologians were fond of the Latin phrase distinctio sed non separatio (a distinction but not a separation).

J. V. Fesko | Reforming Apologetics: Retrieving the Classic Reformed Approach to Defending the Faith (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2019), 184.


RESOURCES

Heidelberg Reformation Association
1637 E. Valley Parkway #391
Escondido CA 92027
USA
The HRA is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization


    Post authored by:

  • Heidelblog
    Author Image

    The Heidelblog has been in publication since 2007. It is devoted to recovering the Reformed confession and to helping others discover Reformed theology, piety, and practice.

    More by Heidelblog ›

Subscribe to the Heidelblog today!