That which overthrows the main difference, between the Law and Gospel, ought not be admitted; for the confounding of them will open an in-let to innumerable errors; nay by this means the Gospel itself will become a mere cypher. The Apostle [Paul] we see was exceeding[ly] careful to keep these doctrines distinct from each other.¹

William Eyre (c. 1612–1670) | Justification without Conditions; or Free Justification of a Sinner, (London: 1654), 57.

Endnotes

1. “Amongst such labors and endeavors (Christian reader) I commend to thy consideration, the ensuing Treatise and commit thee to the Lord.” —Westminster, Nov. 7, 1653. John Owen.

RESOURCES

• How To Subscribe To Heidelmedia
• The Heidelblog Resource Page
• Heidelmedia Resources
• The Ecumenical Creeds
• The Reformed Confessions
• The Heidelberg Catechism
• Recovering the Reformed Confession (Phillipsburg: P&R Publishing, 2008)
• Why I Am A Christian
• Support Heidelmedia: use the donate button or send a check to:
  Heidelberg Reformation Association
  1637 E. Valley Parkway #391
  Escondido CA 92027
  USA
• Heidelblog Contributors
• Resources on the Law/Gospel Distinction

Post authored by:

• Inwoo Lee

  

  Inwoo Lee (BA, UCSD) earned his MA (Historical Theology) in 2020 from Westminster Seminary California and is author of “Righteous Before God: William Perkins’ Doctrine of Justification in Elizabethan England” (MA Thesis, Westminster Seminary California, 2020). He lives in the Great Seoul area, in South Korea with his wife Holly.

  More by Inwoo Lee ›