When people’s average perceptions of group sizes are compared to actual population estimates, an intriguing pattern emerges: Americans tend to vastly overestimate the size of minority groups. This holds for sexual minorities, including the proportion of gays and lesbians (estimate: 30%, true: 3%), bisexuals (estimate: 29%, true: 4%), and people who are transgender (estimate: 21%, true: 0.6%).
t also applies to religious minorities, such as Muslim Americans (estimate: 27%, true: 1%) and Jewish Americans (estimate: 30%, true: 2%). And we find the same sorts of overestimates for racial and ethnic minorities, such as Native Americans (estimate: 27%, true: 1%), Asian Americans (estimate: 29%, true: 6%), and Black Americans (estimate: 41%, true: 12%).
A parallel pattern emerges when we look at estimates of majority groups: People tend to underestimate rather than overestimate their size relative to their actual share of the adult population. For instance, we find that people underestimate the proportion of American adults who are Christian (estimate: 58%, true: 70%) and the proportion who have at least a high school degree (estimate: 65%, true: 89%).
…Black Americans estimate that, on average, Black people make up 52% of the U.S. adult population; non-Black Americans estimate the proportion is roughly 39%, closer to the real figure of 12%. First-generation immigrants we surveyed estimate that first-generation immigrants account for 40% of U.S. adults, while non-immigrants guess it is around 31%, closer to the actual figure of 14%.
Although there is some question-by-question variability, the results from our survey show that inaccurate perceptions of group size are not limited to the types of socially charged group divisions typically explored in similar studies: race, religion, sexuality, education, and income. Americans are equally likely to misestimate the size of less widely discussed groups, such as adults who are left-handed. While respondents estimated that 34% of U.S. adults are left-handed, the real estimate lies closer to 10-12%. Similar misperceptions are found regarding the proportion of American adults who own a pet, have read a book in the past year, or reside in various cities or states. This suggests that errors in judgment are not due to the specific context surrounding a certain group.
…Does correcting misperceptions of group size change peoples’ attitudes on related issues? Current research suggests it does not. Read more»
Taylor Orth | “From Millionaires to Muslims, Small Subgroups of the Population Seem Much Larger to Many Americans” | March 15, 2022
Resources
- How To Subscribe To Heidelmedia
- The Heidelblog Resource Page
- Heidelmedia Resources
- The Ecumenical Creeds
- The Reformed Confessions
- The Heidelberg Catechism
- Recovering the Reformed Confession (Phillipsburg: P&R Publishing, 2008).
- Support Heidelmedia: use the donate button below.
- Lesbian Atheist: Nature, Science, And Facts Matter
- Princeton Historian Rebukes 1619 Project: The Facts Still Matter
- Facts, Evidence, Wisdom, And Gossip
- The Myth Of The Bell Rope
- Why “Settled Science” Is A Myth (And Why Just A Little History Shows That)
- The Gentle Genevans: Reversing The Myth Of The Persecution Of Witches In Calvin’s Geneva
I saw this a week or so ago and have been reflecting on it ever since. It is almost like we are a people who are easily deceived… 😉
Read Daniel Kahneman’s “Thinking Fast and Slow” for fascinating insight into how poorly most people perceive reality, and how easily manipulated perceptions like these are, across all groups. Statisticians, too, are also notoriously bad at estimating statistics; we are all “men equally involved in ruin.”