Daleiden explained how, in grant applications to receive NIH funding, the University of Pittsburgh essentially advertised their facilities as the best location for the GUDMAP aborted fetal kidney harvesting program. Pitt described how aborted babies are still alive at the time their kidneys are cut out. This was a selling point for why Pitt should receive millions of taxpayer dollars.
“When they say they ‘track and record the warm ischemia time,’ that means they know the time at which fetuses lose their circulation and lose their blood supply,” Daleiden said reading from the grant application. “They specifically say labor induction, not just a forceps extraction abortion, but a labor induction abortion where they induce labor and the mom pushes out a baby at 24 weeks.”
Those two statements together – that they know how to keep the time of blood loss in the kidneys to a minimum and that they perform induced-labor abortion – show these are “clear, classic cases of partial-birth abortion or this is just straight-up infanticide,” Daleiden said. Read more»
Madeline Osburn | “Here’s What We Know About Pitt’s Sadistic Experiments On Unborn Babies” | October 13, 2021
Resources
- How To Subscribe To Heidelmedia
- The Heidelblog Resource Page
- Heidelmedia Resources
- The Ecumenical Creeds
- The Reformed Confessions
- The Heidelberg Catechism
- Recovering the Reformed Confession (Phillipsburg: P&R Publishing, 2008).
- Support Heidelmedia: use the donate button below.
- Resources On Abortion
R. Scott Clark
R.Scott Clark is the President of the Heidelberg Reformation Association, the author and editor of, and contributor to several books and the author of many articles. He has taught church history and historical theology since 1997 at Westminster Seminary California. He has also taught at Wheaton College, Reformed Theological Seminary, and Concordia University. He has hosted the Heidelblog since 2007.
More by R. Scott Clark ›
Does anyone know what, if any, response was made to the letter?
It is amazing how evil people can be when their justification is “for the good of humanity.” “To the pure, all things are pure, but to the defiled and unbelieving, nothing is pure; but both their minds and their consciences are defiled.” Titus 1:15
Josef Mengele would be proud of these “medical experiments.”
I strongly suspect Margaret Sanger would be, too.
For those who don’t click links to read articles — click this one and read the full article from The Federalist. It’s not the usual yada-yada. The babies used in these experiments had to be delivered by induced labor, and were delivered at a relatively advanced stage of pregnancy. There is a very high likelihood that, if both of those two categories apply, the abortion clinic violated state and possibly federal laws on partial-birth abortion.
This ought to shock even some of the more moderate supporters of early-term abortions. It may legally be infanticide even under current abortion laws.