The 1619 Project is a thesis in search of evidence, not the other way around. Read more»

Bret Stephens, “The 1619 Chronicles,” The New York Times (October 9, 2020).

Resources

• How To Subscribe To Heidelmedia
• National Association Of Scholars: Revoke Pulitzer Prize For 1619 Project
• Princeton Historian Rebukes 1619 Project: The Facts Still Matter
• Oxford Historian Carwardine: 1619 Project “Preposterous” And “Tendentious”
• Guelzo: “The 1619 Project Is Not History; It Is Ignorance“

Post authored by:

• R. Scott Clark

  

  R.Scott Clark is the President of the Heidelberg Reformation Association, the author and editor of, and contributor to several books and the author of many articles. He is professor emeritus of church history and historical theology at Westminster Seminary California, where he taught for 29 years. He also taught at Wheaton College, Reformed Theological Seminary, and Concordia University. He has hosted the Heidelblog since 2007 and the Heidelcast since 2009.

  More by R. Scott Clark ›