Rutherford: Salvation By Works Is Heresy

It is a Socinian and heretical position to conclude that we can be saved through keeping God’s commands even though we wrongly conceive of God in our minds and are ignorant of him, his nature, attributes, and works as they are revealed in Scripture.

Samuel Rutherford, The Works of Samuel Rutherford: Arminianism: A Systematic and Theological Response, ed. Chad Van Dixhoorn, trans. David C. Noe (Reformation Heritage Books, 2026), 1:266.


RESOURCES

Heidelberg Reformation Association
1637 E. Valley Parkway #391
Escondido CA 92027
USA
The HRA is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization


    Post authored by:

  • Inwoo Lee
    Author Image

    Inwoo Lee (BA, UCSD) earned his MA (Historical Theology) in 2020 from Westminster Seminary California and is author of “Righteous Before God: William Perkins’ Doctrine of Justification in Elizabethan England” (MA Thesis, Westminster Seminary California, 2020). He lives in the Great Seoul area, in South Korea with his wife Holly.

    More by Inwoo Lee ›

Subscribe to the Heidelblog today!


4 comments

  1. The Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed – which strikes me as the best succinct summation of the truth of Christian faith – makes clear that salvation is through Jesus Christ. It is given, not earned. In his often misunderstood epistle, James is arguing that our actions speak as loudly as our words – that we are not earning salvation through our works, but we are reiterating (or repudiating) our baptism through how we live our lives.

  2. Thank you for this quote! Yes any claim that we can be saved by works is the ultimate heresy. Adam first proved that he, and his progeny, are incapable of obeying the covenant of works. God then graciously promised salvation by a second Adam who would fulfill the covenant of works perfectly and suffer the penalty of death for those that trust this promise. So to look to the failed way of salvation through works, is to reject the fundamental truth of God’s Word. I can’t imagine a greater heresy.

  3. Does this quote as it stands address the issue of what forms unbelief can take, without listing them all? Or is it trying to describe them all?

Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments are welcome but must observe the moral law. Comments that are profane, deny the gospel, advance positions contrary to the Reformed confession, or that irritate the management are subject to deletion. Anonymous comments, posted without permission, are forbidden. Please use a working email address so we can contact you, if necessary, about content or corrections.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.