Groothuis: We Will Not Forfeit Our Souls To AI

AI cannot read and it cannot write because it is not conscious, and thus it has neither will nor discernment. It believes nothing, feels nothing, and knows nothing. It is we human beings, made in God’s image (Genesis 1:26–27), who read and write because we are conscious agents who desire knowledge and its benefits—at least when we are at our best. AI scans data and produces text. It is a machine. Some of it is impressive and some of it is even true. But we will not let that impress us as writers or replace us as writers.

We refuse it. The machine will not manacle our minds. We will never affix our names to text that we did not write. We will not outsource our personalities to impersonal programs, no matter how efficient or convincing or popular or profitable. We will not bear false witness (Exodus 20:16). We will not trust AI “research” if we cannot verify the source. We will disable or ignore AI suggestions on improving style. We will not let AI “edit” our work, but will rely on editors. We will interact with them on our terms. We will not use AI to “clarify” or to “sound more academic” or to “sound less academic” or to “write at a graduate school level” or for anything. We will not use AI to merge or edit documents. We will do research for ourselves. We will not use AI to save time if in saving time we lose our literary souls to AI.
We will teach others these commitments by precept and by example. As teachers, we will ban AI in the writing of our student’s papers. We will not use AI to grade students papers, since it knows nothing and can write nothing. We will evaluate our students work for ourselves. We yearn to teach students to develop their human potential in humane and personal ways, not to become technocratic text generators. We leave that to those who sell their souls to the Machine, God help them. Read more»

Douglas Groothuis | “We Refuse it: A Manifesto on Generative AI Writing” | July 15, 2026


RESOURCES

Heidelberg Reformation Association
1637 E. Valley Parkway #391
Escondido CA 92027
USA
The HRA is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization


    Post authored by:

  • Heidelblog
    Author Image

    The Heidelblog has been in publication since 2007. It is devoted to recovering the Reformed confession and to helping others discover Reformed theology, piety, and practice.

    More by Heidelblog ›

Subscribe to the Heidelblog today!


3 comments

  1. One of the problems I have speaking about AI, is that our language makes it difficult to speak about AI accurately without a great deal of circumlocution. Using Alexa as an example, I say “Alexa told me this,” as if there were a person name Alexa who responded to me. But there is no person there. Or I say, “it told me this.” But there is not even an “it” there, in the sense of a single “thing” responding to me.

    And if I try to think things out and say what I mean more accurately, I find that I’m tying myself up in linguistic knots, because our language forces me to speak as if I’m assuming something that isn’t really true.

    We almost have to use anthropomorphic language, but it’s so easy to forget that’s all it is.

  2. 100% agree! I am on a quest to find biblical evidence against AI so that I can give good reason as to why it should not be used, and this helps! AI is totally evil.

    • Oliver,

      FWIW, I wouldn’t say that AI is “totally evil” but we should cautious and, in this case, writers should do their own work.

      AI covers a lot of ground. When I ask Siri for this or that (the weather, traffic conditions) I’m using AI. That’s not evil. It’s merely harvesting what’s available on the web.

      But turning over writing (and perhaps even editing) to AI is to remove the human from the process of creation.

Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments are welcome but must observe the moral law. Comments that are profane, deny the gospel, advance positions contrary to the Reformed confession, or that irritate the management are subject to deletion. Anonymous comments, posted without permission, are forbidden. Please use a working email address so we can contact you, if necessary, about content or corrections.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.