Here, then, we have the principle tinctured with the blood of our Puritan, Covenanter and Huguenot forefathers — that which is not commanded, either explicitly or implicitly in the Scriptures, is prohibited to the church. She can utter no new doctrine, make no new laws, ordain no new forms of government, and invent no new modes of worship. This is but a statement of a fundamental principle of Protestantism, contra-distinguishing it from Rationalism on the one hand and Romanism on the other — that the Scriptures, as the word of Christ, are the complete and ultimate rule of faith and duty. They are complete, since they furnish as perfect a provision for the spiritual, as does nature for the physical, wants of man, and therefore, exclude every other rule as unnecessary and superfluous. They are ultimate because, being the word of God, they must pronounce infallibly and supremely upon all questions relating to religious faith and practice. The duty of the church, consequently, to conform herself strictly to the divine word, and her guilt and danger in departing from it would seem to be transparently evident. But the clearest principles, through the blindness, fallibility, and perverseness of the human mind, frequently prove inoperative in actual experience; and the history of the church furnishes lamentable proof that the great, regulative truth of the completeness and supremacy of the Scriptures constitutes no exception to this remark.
John L. Girardeau (1825–98) “The Discretionary Power of the Church” (HT: ChortlesWeakly)
I am looking for a simple explanation of the biblical reason for each element of the worship service. My plan is to rotate one element’s explaination in a Sunday am bulletin each week (mostly for visitors and s reminder to members). Does anyone out there do anything similar to this so I don’t reinvent the wheel?
Here’s something I wrote years ago on behalf of the consistory of the Escondido URC, which they adopted. It’s a start:
There’s more in Recovering the Reformed Confession
Thank you dr clark
Is this to do with regulative principle of worship?
Yes. For the Reformed sola scriptura and the RPW closely related. Sola scriptura is broader but the RPW is the application of sola scriptura to public worship.
It impresses me as I read the WLC on the Fifth Commandment that the sins of superiors are for more extensively expounded than those or inferiors. As I look at the Puritan political thinkers, I am impressed that the Reformed view of authority is that it is a stewardship rather than mastery. The regulative principle seems to be part of the same general view of God and man.