Progress Or Regress?

So, since our 1973 founding, the PCA has “progressed” from “committed without reservation” to our Standards, to a “good faith subscription” approach that has opened the PCA’s door to paedocommunion, intinction, female pseudo-officers, Federal Vision, theistic evolution (e.g., Biologos), et al, all of which depart from the Scriptures and the Standards.

—Bob Mattes, “A Tale Of Two Letters

    Post authored by:

  • R. Scott Clark
    Author Image

    R.Scott Clark is the President of the Heidelberg Reformation Association, the author and editor of, and contributor to several books and the author of many articles. He has taught church history and historical theology since 1997 at Westminster Seminary California. He has also taught at Wheaton College, Reformed Theological Seminary, and Concordia University. He has hosted the Heidelblog since 2007.

    More by R. Scott Clark ›

Subscribe to the Heidelblog today!


One comment

  1. “The PCA has become a tribal congregationalist denomination where particular errors find toleration in specific presbyteries that remain unaccountable to the denomination as a whole.”

    Once the Standards no longer have the real role as a binding (read – discipline) confession of faith for the church they then become the equivilant of a “living constitution.” And looking over last 60 years of the civil kingdom judicial landscape of the U.S. one can see were that leads…

    As one of my grandsons once said to my wife when she couldn’t get a video to work, “Mimi, not good…”

Comments are closed.