“There are men nowadays who teach a foolish godliness instead of Christ’s doctrine. What does it profit me to fast new Lents or to pay my tithes? Why trust myself to formulas of prayer of unknown authors and leave aside the prescriptions of the apostles. Why die in the cassock when one has lived his whole life in the secular habit? No such thing is ordered in Christ’s doctrine. The balance may be more superstitious than religious. Let us therefore attach ourselves to Christ alone and to the doctrine of the apostles, for it is sufficient and it is first and paramount for salvation.”
Jacques Lefèvre d’Étaples(c.1455–1536) quoted in James I. Good, The Reformed Reformation (Philadelphia, PA: The Heidelberg Press, 1916), 12–13.
RESOURCES
- Philip Edgcumbe Hughes, Lefèvre: Pioneer of Ecclesiastical Renewal in France (1985).
- Subscribe To The Heidelblog!
- Download the HeidelApp on Apple App Store or Google Play
- The Heidelblog Resource Page
- Heidelmedia Resources
- The Ecumenical Creeds
- The Reformed Confessions
- The Heidelberg Catechism
- The Heidelberg Catechism: A Historical, Theological, & Pastoral Commentary (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2025)
- Recovering the Reformed Confession (Phillipsburg: P&R Publishing, 2008)
- Why I Am A Christian
- What Must A Christian Believe?
- Heidelblog Contributors
- Support Heidelmedia: use the donate button or send a check to
Heidelberg Reformation Association
1637 E. Valley Parkway #391
Escondido CA 92027
USA
The HRA is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization
Heidelblog
The Heidelblog has been in publication since 2007. It is devoted to recovering the Reformed confession and to helping others discover Reformed theology, piety, and practice.
More by Heidelblog ›
It’s time for my annual comment at this time of year, which has become a little personal tradition: “I’m giving up superstitions for Lent.”
Fascinating. Could you hepf provide some interpretation/context for these phrases? “fast new Lents” Why the word new?
“Why die in the cassock when one has lived his whole life in the secular habit?” Don’t understand what this is referring to.
MJD,
The earliest reference to any extended fasting refers to 3 days, I think. The 40 day Lenten fast dates to Canon 5 of Nicaea (325). LeFevre here seems to be alluding to medieval elaborations on Lent.
The reference to “the cassock” is a reference to ordination. “Secular habit” refers either to the dress of those not ordained or to priests who were not in a Monastic order. Either way he is complaining about the growing scrupulosity of the medieval church.