The Difference Between What We Know And What We Think We Know

by on August 21, 2015 | 1 Comment

…much of what is commonly written on the history and development of the western liturgy is dependent upon reconstructions….

—D. M. Hope, “Liturgical Books” in Cheslyn Jones, Geoffrey Wainwright, and Edward Yarnold, ed. The Study of Liturgy (NY: OUP, 1978), 66.

    Post authored by:

  • R. Scott Clark
    Author Image

    R.Scott Clark is the President of the Heidelberg Reformation Association, the author and editor of, and contributor to several books and the author of many articles. He has taught church history and historical theology since 1997 at Westminster Seminary California. He has also taught at Wheaton College, Reformed Theological Seminary, and Concordia University. He has hosted the Heidelblog since 2007.

    More by R. Scott Clark ›

Subscribe to the Heidelblog today!


One comment

  1. I’m sure this is true, and also that we have a strong tendency to read into what we know what we’d like it to be! This is why I’m finding it so refreshing to hear from the Reformers themselves on the Heidelblog on their theology of worship. Thank you!

Comments are closed.