Somewhere along the way, however, the evangel became increasingly separated from evangelism; the message became subservient to the methods. Today, it is taken for granted by many that those most concerned about doctrine are least interested in reaching the lost (or, as they are now called, the “unchurched”). We are frequently challenged to choose between being traditional or missional, usually with little definition offered for either. Where the earlier evangelical consensus coalesced simultaneously around getting the gospel right and getting it out, increasingly today the coalition is defined by its style (“contemporary” versus “traditional”), its politics (“compassionate conservatism” or the more recent rediscovery of revivalism’s progressivist roots), and its “rock-star” leaders, than for its convictions about God, humanity, sin, salvation, the purpose of history, and the last judgment.
Mike Horton (2010)
- How To Subscribe To Heidelmedia
- Office Hours: Missional and Reformed—Lloyd Kim Takes the Gospel & NT Scholarship to SE Asia
- Something for the “Missional” Movement to Consider
- More Audio: On Being Missional, Reformed, and Foolish
- What Makes a Church Missional?
- Missional Monday: Who Has the Keys?
- Why The Mission Needs The Marks
- Resources On Church Growth And Ordinary Means Ministry