Van Mastricht Taught Republication

It is asked, eighth, whether the covenant of grace was promulgated in the Decalogue. The famous Cameron, because he did not distinguish carefully enough between the use of the Decalogue and its nature, stated that the Decalogue was neither the covenant of works nor the covenant of grace, but a certain subservient covenant, insofar as like a pedagogue, it drove the elect to seek Christ (Gal. 3:24; Rom. 10:4–5). The celebrated Cocceius with his followers, since he stated that by its violation the covenant of works was plainly abolished, nor did anything remain except the eternal and universal testament of grace until the Israelites’ making of the calf, after which the Decalogue, with the adding of the twofold formula, “Do this and you will live,” and “Cursed be the one who will not remain in all things which are written in the book of the law,” accepted not indeed the essence of the covenant of works, but yet the appearance of it, stated that the Decalogue is the pure, unadulterated covenant of grace.

On the contrary, the rest of the Reformed state that in the Decalogue there is no promulgation of the covenant of grace, but only the renewal of the covenant of works, although that renewal, at least in relation to the elect, had an evangelical use, that it would drive them to embrace Christ. This is so because: (1) the Decalogue has nothing of Christ, nothing of faith in Christ. (2) Even if it did set forth Christ and faith in Christ, which yet we do not grant, yet it still has in addition all moral good works; accordingly we would not be justified by faith alone, because without any doubt we are justified by the observance of the covenant of grace. (3) The Decalogue has all those things (with only the positive commandment excepted, concerning not eating the forbidden fruit) which God stipulated from our first parents in the covenant of works. (4) It is also sanctioned with threats and promises, in the same way as the covenant of works. Therefore nothing prohibits saying that it properly presents the covenant of works again, although in relation to the elect, for an evangelical end and use. Nor is it any hindrance that in it mention is made of that formula which pertains to the covenant of grace, “I am your God,” because entirely nothing is repugnant to urging obedience to the covenant of works by arguments and motives taken from the benefits of the covenant of grace. But we will set aside this argument for its proper place, concerning the dispensation of the covenant of grace under Moses (bk. 8, ch. 2).

Petrus Van Mastricht | Theoretical-Practical Theology: Redemption in Christ, vol. 4, trans. Todd Rester (Reformation Heritage Books, 2023), 45–46 (HT: Joseph Randall).


RESOURCES

Heidelberg Reformation Association
1637 E. Valley Parkway #391
Escondido CA 92027
USA
The HRA is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization


    Post authored by:

  • Heidelblog
    Author Image

    The Heidelblog has been in publication since 2007. It is devoted to recovering the Reformed confession and to helping others discover Reformed theology, piety, and practice.

    More by Heidelblog ›

Subscribe to the Heidelblog today!


Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments are welcome but must observe the moral law. Comments that are profane, deny the gospel, advance positions contrary to the Reformed confession, or that irritate the management are subject to deletion. Anonymous comments, posted without permission, are forbidden. Please use a working email address so we can contact you, if necessary, about content or corrections.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.