God’s people have always needed discernment to distinguish the voices that edify from those that merely impress (Jer. 23:16; 2 Cor. 11:5, 13). Throughout history, the Lord has raised up prophets who proclaimed his word with courage and tears. Jeremiah, John the Baptist, the Lord Jesus, the apostle Paul, and others show that the hallmark of a true prophet is not popularity or rhetorical skill but the burden of declaring God’s hard truth to those most able to hurt them—whatever the cost.
Admirers of Doug Wilson hail him as a modern-day prophet, the voice we need in our cultural moment. Wilson himself has embraced the mantle. In a 2019 post titled “On the Nature of Prophetic Language,” written to defend his use of a vulgar epithet for women, he described his offensive language as “part of a prophetic ministry” and identified it with “the prophetic office.” More recently, when Kevin DeYoung cautioned pastors against choosing prophetic punditry over faithful shepherding (“Brothers, We Are Not Political Pundits”), Wilson reframed the alternative as “a carefully calibrated and calculated irrelevance.” His pretensions are reinforced by associates such as Toby Sumpter, who contends that Wilson and Moscow “mock the prophets of Baal and the schoolmarm Pharisees of our day, just like Jesus did and all of the faithful prophets,” and Joe Rigney, who insists that apart from The Babylon Bee, only Wilson and his circle embody the satirical “prophetic mode of speech.”
Confusing Doug Wilson with a prophetic voice distorts the prophetic office and damages the church. I write with this concern not as an outsider but as one who pastored in the CREC for more than a decade. From that vantage I saw both the appeal of Wilson’s persona and the theological and moral toll it exacts, though one need not be in the CREC to recognize the pattern. My concern now, as it was then, is to guard Christ’s flock from mistaking brand-building provocation for authentic prophetic ministry. Read more»
Jeremy Sexton | “Doug Wilson Is Not A Prophet” | September 23, 2025
RESOURCES
- Subscribe To The Heidelblog!
- Download the HeidelApp on Apple App Store or Google Play
- Browse the Heidelshop!
- The Heidelblog Resource Page
- Heidelmedia Resources
- The Ecumenical Creeds
- The Reformed Confessions
- The Heidelberg Catechism
- The Heidelberg Catechism: A Historical, Theological, & Pastoral Commentary (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2025)
- Recovering the Reformed Confession (Phillipsburg: P&R Publishing, 2008)
- Why I Am A Christian
- What Must A Christian Believe?
- Heidelblog Contributors
- Support Heidelmedia: use the donate button or send a check to
Heidelberg Reformation Association
1637 E. Valley Parkway #391
Escondido CA 92027
USA
The HRA is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization
Heidelblog
The Heidelblog has been in publication since 2007. It is devoted to recovering the Reformed confession and to helping others discover Reformed theology, piety, and practice.
More by Heidelblog ›
“Prophets are not brand-builders. They do not churn out clickbait, market novelty flamethrowers, or traffic in gimmicks and stunts. They do not engage in “Christotainment” reaction videos (“watch me watch someone else”), a form that reached peak irony when Wilson found himself watching himself.”
Besides the flamethrower part, would this not also describe some ministers in “our own” circles?
[edited by the moderator]
This is helpful. Jeremy Sexton also wrote a very helpful article in Themelios a while ago looking at theo-recon postmillennialism: https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/themelios/article/postmillennialism-a-biblical-critique/
That can be said of many ‘influencers’ today.