credit: dooce.com
R. Scott Clark
R.Scott Clark is the President of the Heidelberg Reformation Association, the author and editor of, and contributor to several books and the author of many articles. He has taught church history and historical theology since 1997 at Westminster Seminary California. He has also taught at Wheaton College, Reformed Theological Seminary, and Concordia University. He has hosted the Heidelblog since 2007.
More by R. Scott Clark ›
that is cake right ? :S
Perish the thought, man! LOL!
Forbidden cake tastes so much better than forbidden fruit!
There had to have been dogs, but were there cats before the Fall?
This vein of thought is undoubtedly ancillary to the intended theme of the post, but I’ll entertain some thoughts on the O so divisive cats vs. dogs controversy.
First, although I’m not quite sure why, I have found many Reformed folk to love dogs while hating cats. Yet biblically speaking, God chose a feline reference to favorably describe Himself (the Lion of Judah), while Jesus followed the historical Jewish thinking in using the term “dog” as an ultimate insult.
So let’s get our biblical “animoligy” straight out there! 😉
Animoligy…HA!!!
Phil,
We live in the New Testament. The dogs have been gathered into the fold. Cat’s, not liking this new administration, have apostatized and gone after their own folly.
Reminds me of Stephen King’s “Children of the Corn”! I believe that story took place in Nebraska too.
Children of the Cake?