The Heidelblog

Search

Primary Menu

Skip to content
  • About
    • R. Scott Clark
    • Heidelmedia
    • Heidelblog Resources
    • Heidelblog Contributors
    • Categories
    • Subscribe
    • HeidelShop
  • Contact
  • The Heidelcast
  • Books & Essays

judicial laws

Audio: Fesko on What to Do with the "Stoning" Passage?

by
  • R. Scott Clark
on November 4, 2009 | 2 Comments

One of the things that offends modernist sensibilities is the law in Deuteronomy 21 that requires the stoning of incorrigibly rebellious children. On the other side we face the theonomic call to reinstitute some version of this law in post-canonical civil law. . . . Continue reading →

Categorized Audio, Christian Life | Tagged Deut 21, John Fesko, judicial laws, stoning | 2 Comments

Westminster Confession On The Threefold Distinction In The Law And The Abrogation Of The Mosaic Judicial Laws

by
  • R. Scott Clark
on June 30, 2017

3. Beside this law, commonly called moral, God was pleased to give to the people of Israel, as a church under age, ceremonial laws, containing several typical ordinances, partly of worship, prefiguring Christ, his graces, actions, sufferings, and benefits; and partly, holding . . . Continue reading →

It Was The Anabaptist Karlstadt Not The Confessional Protestants Who Taught Theonomy

by
  • R. Scott Clark
on January 18, 2020

The [New Testament] does not introduce any new laws about the civil estate, but commands us to obey the existing laws, whether they were formulated by heathen or by others, and in this obedience to practice love. It was mad of Carlstadt . . . Continue reading →

Boston: The Judicial Laws Were Temporary. The Moral Law Is Permanent

by
  • R. Scott Clark
on January 18, 2020

Secondly, There are three sorts of laws we find in the word. 1. The ceremonial law, which was given by Moses. This bound only the Jews, and that to the coming of Christ, by whom it was abrogated, being a shadow of . . . Continue reading →

Witsius: Christians Have Been Liberated From the Mosaic Judicial Laws

by
  • R. Scott Clark
on January 18, 2020 | 1 Comment

XIX. That liberty, therefore, which is peculiar to the New Testament is, 1st. A discharge from the bondage of the elements of the world, or of the ancient ceremonies, from whose religious obligation, as of things necessary, the consciences of men were . . . Continue reading →

Gillespie And Piscator: The Natural Law Remains In Force

by
  • R. Scott Clark
on January 18, 2020

But how doth it appear that these or any other Judicial Laws of Moses do at all appertain to us, as rules to guide us in like cases? I shall with him who scrupleth this, to read Piscator his Appendix to his . . . Continue reading →

Samuel Rutherford Contra Theonomy On General Equity

by
  • R. Scott Clark
on February 29, 2020 | 2 Comments

Judicial laws may be judicial and Mosaical, and so not obligatory to us, according to the degree and quality of punishment, such as in Deuteronomy 13, the destroying the city, and devoting all therein to a curse; we may not do the . . . Continue reading →

Samuel Rutherford: “The Whole Bulk Of The Judicial Laws…Is Expired”

by
  • R. Scott Clark
on February 29, 2020 | 2 Comments

That this Author saith, God commanded those that transgressed his holy Law with an high hand, and presumptuously to be killed, lest they should live and profane his holy things; I defend not: But sure Erastus erreth, who will have all such . . . Continue reading →

Subscribe to the Heidelblog today!

Recent Comments

  • Xavier on New Edition of Ursinus’ On The Catechism
  • R. Scott Clark on Concerning Scandals And Scandalizers
  • Richard Lindberg on The Ascension Of Christ: A Primer
  • Gil Garcia on Church Planting In Phoenix’s West Valley: Inheritance United Reformed Church
  • Carmen on Calvin: We Baptize The Children Of Believers In Recognition Of Their Membership In The Covenant Of Grace

Resources

  • Welcome to the Heidelblog!
  • Books and Essays
  • R. Scott Clark
  • Contact
  • Archives
  • Categories
  • Using the HB Effectively
  • What Must A Christian Believe?
  • Heidelblog Resources
  • Discovering The Reformed Confession
  • Heidelberg Catechism (1563)
  • Top HB Posts Through The Years
  • The Ecumenical Creeds
  • The Reformed Confessions
  • Heidelberg Reformation Association
  • The Heidelcast
  • The Heidelberg Catechism Podcast
  • The Canons Of Dork
  • Subscribe To The Heidelblog!
  • Covenant Theology And Infant Baptism
  • Heidelmedia Archive
  • Feathers And All (Or Why The Scriptures Are Enough)
  • Heidelberg Reformation Association Privacy Policy
  • Heidelblog Contributors
  • Heidelcast Series: The Comfort Of The Covenant
  • How To Read The Bible
  • Recursos Reformados Em Português
  • Resources On The Internal/External Distinction In The Covenant Of Grace
  • Resources On The Spirituality Of The Church
  • Resources On The Doctrine Of The Church (Ecclesiology)
  • Heidelcast Series: Ordinary Means
  • Resources On Confessional Subscription
  • Resources On Weddings And Funerals
  • Heidelcast: Saturday Superfriends!
  • POPLL: An Alternative To Christian Nationalism (And Theonomy, Christian Reconstruction, Theocracy, And Christendom)
  • Resources On Lent
  • Resources On Instruments In Worship
  • Featley: The Sweet Dipper
  • Resources On Richard Baxter
  • The Cradle Of Christian Truth: The Apostles’ Creed
  • The Fruit Of The Spirit Series
  • Heidelcast Series: To Nourish And Sustain
  • Heidelminicast Series: Calvin’s Short Treatise On The Lord’s Supper

The “Ruformation” Continues: Heideldog 2

Heidelshop

Proudly powered by WordPress


Copyright © 2025 R. Scott Clark. All Rights Reserved. The Heidelberg Reformation Association is a tax-exempt 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. Federal ID number available upon request. The Heidelblog® and Heidelcast® are registered trademarks. Hosted by Kinsta.