Iain has helpful thoughts relative to the (breathtaking) brevity of the ETS statement. I’m not sure I agree with his assessment of the academic quality of the ETS. Prima facie evidence: 1) they’ve allowed me to give papers; 2) perhaps the bib studies folk are doing a better job but I’ve been disappointed with the history and theology sections. After considerable hectoring from a fellow blogger I “re-upped” my lapsed membership but once I again I’m lapsed.
Post authored by:
R. Scott Clark

R.Scott Clark is the President of the Heidelberg Reformation Association, the author and editor of, and contributor to several books and the author of many articles. He is professor emeritus of church history and historical theology at Westminster Seminary California, where he taught for 29 years. He also taught at Wheaton College, Reformed Theological Seminary, and Concordia University. He has hosted the Heidelblog since 2007 and the Heidelcast since 2009.
More by R. Scott Clark ›