Stott: "Substitution" is Not a Theory by R. Scott Clark on March 26, 2009 | 1 Comment At DeYoung, Restless, and Reformed. Subscribe to the Heidelblog today! Email Required* Twitter
The irony here is that Tony Jones wrote a blurb on the cover of the latest edition of Stott’s book extolling it as the best defense of the penal substitutionary ‘theory’ of the atonement. I wonder if he actually read it.
The irony here is that Tony Jones wrote a blurb on the cover of the latest edition of Stott’s book extolling it as the best defense of the penal substitutionary ‘theory’ of the atonement. I wonder if he actually read it.